U2 – The Joshua Tree (30th Anniversary)

2017 sees the 30^th anniversary of one of U2’s classic albums – The Joshua Tree.  It was the culmination of all the band had been working towards in the 80s.  It has soaring choruses, widescreen soundscapes, and at least three classic songs.  In celebration of the anniversary U2 have announced a stadium tour of the US and Europe for 2017. 

For a band that has always looked forward, this trip back 30 years seems a little odd.  Sure, to promote the tour, they’re saying things like: 

“It seems like we have come full circle from when The Joshua Tree songs were originally written, with global upheaval, extreme right wing politics and some fundamental human rights at risk,” reflects The Edge. “To celebrate the album - as these songs seem so relevant and prescient of these times too - we decided to do these shows, it feels right for now. We’re looking forward to it.”

“Recently I listened back to The Joshua Tree for the first time in nearly 30 years,” adds Bono. “It’s quite an opera. A lot of emotions which feel strangely current, love, loss, broken dreams, seeking oblivion, polarisation… all the greats...”

But it still feels strange that a band where wanting to feel “relevant” (whatever that means) is part of its DNA is doing a retro tour. Having said that, in light of these comments, I thought I’d listen to the album and see if those themes do resonate in 2017 as much as they did in 1987.

The main thing that hits you on re-listening to the album is that it is a really great collection of songs.  There’s really not a dud song on the album.  It starts off with the three above mentioned classic songs (Where the Streets Have No Name, I Still Haven’t Found What I’m Looking For, With or Without You) but the quality doesn’t drop even for a second.  In fact, the album is quite varied.  There are rock songs (Bullet the Blue Sky), bluesy numbers (Trip Through your Wires), epic songs (One Tree Hill), moody jams (Exit) and probably the best U2 single that never was (Red Hill Mining Town).  It’s really great.  I think it would make for a great concert! 

By the time you get to the end of the album it does feel that Bono’s words aren’t entirely misplaced.  There are tales of love and loss and broken dreams.  The themes do resonate today (I mean it’s no shock that U2 write political songs).  While there is obviously some marketing spin about the album being relevant in 2017 the comments aren’t without merit. 

Special mention should be made about some of the B-sides (remember them) released at the time.  These can be found on the deluxe edition bonus disc.  Songs like The Sweetest Thing, Spanish Eyes, Luminous Times and Walk to the Water certainly hold their own alongside the album.  It really shows what a rich creative vein U2 were mining at the time.

The cynic in me thinks that there’s another reason they are doing this tour.  After the debacle surrounding the release of Songs of Innocence (good album, terrible marketing campaign – no need to mention the downloading onto your iPhone thing again is there?) they needed to do something to clear their plate in the minds of the public (so to speak).  What better way than to tour your most popular album and then (as has been promised) release the follow up to Innocence - Songs of Experience later in the year. 

U2 - Pop

This year, U2 are celebrating the 30^th anniversary of one of their greatest successes (the Joshua Tree), but it is also the 20^th anniversary of the much maligned Pop album.  I would argue that this was U2’s last great album – their last brave album.

The 90s was, without doubt, U2’s most interesting decade.  They famously decamped to Berlin to seek the muse and they found her with the release of their greatest album Achtung Baby.  Starting off as a way to kill time on tour, the planned follow up EP grew into the excellent Zooropa album.  They filled a bit of time by writing songs that featured on soundtracks to films and the truly unique Passengers project.   It’s safe to say that U2 were on a creative roll. 

Obviously enamored with 90s dance culture the first sounds you hear from Pop certainly scared the horses.  Calling your first single Discotheque was one thing.  But dressing up in Village People gear for the video was another.  No wonder Middle America decided to head for the exits.  But that was their loss.  Looking under the façade of the disco suits shows that U2 were still the serious young things that they always were.  Discotheque is a riddle wrapped in a mystery trying to decipher the enigma that is love.  “You can reach, But you can't grab it, You can hold it, control it …”

Following this is MOFO – a song about the loss of Bono’s mother.  All of this is presented in the shiny wrapping of dance music with U2 pulling the classic bait and switch trick of pretending to be superficial but delivering some of the most meaningful songs in their catalogue. 

 

The rest of the album, for better or worse, is a grab bag of songs showing the band wasn’t out of ideas.  There are straight ahead rockers (Last Night on Earth, Gone) trip hop numbers (Miami), torch songs (If you wear that velvet dress), a song about politics (Please), love songs in the vein of One (If God Will send his angels).  The surfeit of ideas was probably the undoing of the album in the end.  It’s unfocussed – the band created new versions of about half the album after its release (and I’m not talking remixes – complete new versions).  But what it lacks in focus, it shows a band having fun, not caring what anyone thinks of them and pretty much pulling it all off.  

 

There’s certainly an argument to me made that they should have cut some songs from the album and made it shorter, but the length and breadth of the music makes for a much more interesting album than the (more successful) follow up All That You Can’t Leave Behind (which features Beautiful Day -  a return to the top of the charts).

 

It feels that everything that U2 has done this century has been a reaction to the response to the Pop album (it wasn’t received to their usual fawning expectations).  The band felt that Pop wasn’t finished before they went out on tour, so albums seem to take forever to finish these days.  The strange and interesting songs have been replaced by safe choices.   They always seem to be searching for “relevance”. 

 

What Pop is crying out for is a reissue – there must be hours of the band early jams and alternative mixes showing the process about how the band came up with this album.  A reissue would also show that the band was ahead of its time.  They were fusing rock and dance right on the cusp of when that became “a thing”.    Certainly for a band searching for “relevance”, this would be no bad thing.